Friday, September 22, 2006

Material Support for Terrorism—Dropped Charge

For nine years, Muhammad Salah “has been the focus of a high-profile terrorism investigation.”[1] He was accused of racketeering conspiracy and false statements, as well as material support for terrorism.[2] Today, in “a move that stunned defense attorneys,” federal prosecutors dropped the material support charge, giving no explanation and declining to comment afterward.[3]

Mr. Salah’s attorney said that this was an “astounding” development, and the announcement “came at a hearing after [he] asked US District Judge Amy J. St. Eve to press prosecutors to turn over background material on a prospective government witness, Jack Mustafa.”[4] Specifically, he requested how much the FBI had paid Mr. Mustafa, as well as Mr. Mustafa’s arrest record; at that point, AUSA Joseph M. Ferguson said that the government wanted the charges dropped, with prejudice, and that Mr. Mustafa would be withdrawn as a witness.[5]

Mr. Salah, along with Abdelhaleem Ashqar, were accused of raising funds to pay for a Hamas terror campaign against the Israeli government.[6]



[1] Mike Robinson, Feds Drop Count in Hamas Terrorism Trial, AP (via Yahoo!), Sep. 22, 2006.
[2] Id.
[3] Id.
[4] Id.
[5] Id.
[6] In Surprise Move, Feds Drop One of Three Counts in Hamas Terrorism Case, AP (via FoxNews), Sep. 22, 2006.

Thursday, September 21, 2006

Detainee Treatment—Compromise

Though it is still early and the full details are not yet available, it seems that the “White House and senior Republican lawmakers reached an agreement on guidelines for interrogating suspects in the US-led war on terror.”[1]

According to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, “the agreement ‘meets three tests: it protects Americans by ensuring that our high value CIA program will be preserved; guarantees that classified sources and methods will not be disclosed to the terrorist detainees; and third, ensures that our military can begin to try terrorists in our custody.’”[2]

Senator John McCain, who had refused to agree with President Bush’s proposed legislation, announced that “There's no doubt that the integrity and letter and spirit of the Geneva Conventions have been preserved.”[3]

It is unclear whether the compromise addresses access to the courts, but tomorrow’s Christian Science Monitor is reporting that the White House is yet again introducing legislation to “strip the federal courts of jurisdiction to hear cases brought by Guantánamo detainees challenging the legality of their confinement.”[4] The legislation is apparently aimed at superseding Rasul v. Bush, which held that Guantanamo detainees were entitled to petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and that federal courts had jurisdiction to hear and decide their cases.[5]

One would think, after being embarrassed globally for the case of Abu Bakker Qassim[6] or Canada’s findings regarding Maher Arar,[7] that the United States would not be so keen on preventing individuals from being able to challenge their detentions; it isn’t like these are the only two “mistakes” that have happened. It was reported last week that 14,000 individuals had been arrested and imprisoned across the world as part of the United States war on terror, and “[m]any say they were often interrogated around the clock, then release months or years later without apology, compensation or any word on why they were taken.”[8]



[1] White House, Congress Reach Accord on Interrogation Guidelines, AFP (via Yahoo!), Sep. 21, 2006.
[2] Id.
[3] Ann Plummer Flaherty, Bush, GOP Rebels Agree on Detainee Bill, AP (via Yahoo!), Sep. 21, 2006.
[4] Warren Richey, For Detainees: Less Access to US Courts? Christian Science Monitor, Sep. 22, 2006.
[5] Id.
[6] Abu Bakker Qassim, Listen to the Pleadings of a Voice from Guantanamo, Houston Chronicle, Sep. 18, 2006. Mr. Qassim is an ethnic Uighur who was captured by bounty hunters and sold to the United States on false pretenses; he has been completely exonerated and released from Guantanamo, but only because he was allowed to challenge his detention.
[7] Ottawa Asks US to Remove Canadian from Terrorist Watch List, AFP (via Yahoo!), Sep. 21, 2006. Mr. Arar was erroneously deported from the United States to his “native” Syria (he holds dual citizenship with Canada) where he was subsequently tortured. He was accused of terrorism, eventually fully exonerated, and when he tried to sue the US government, the district judge dismissed his case, citing national security issues. See also Doug Struck, Canadian Was Falsely Accused, Panel Says, Washington Post, Sep. 19, 2006.
[8] 14,000 Held in Overseas US Prisons, AP (via CBS News), Sep. 17, 2006.